Curve Finance CRV
Payout, not buybackRank#1▲3Score63Holders revenue goes to vote lockers (swap fees and bribes), not to a buyback on the market.
Dexs, Ethereum, Polygon, OP Mainnet +18, 192 days of data
Active signals 1
New in top 20since Oct 31
Ranked #1 on Nov 11, up from #4 the day before.
Market cap
$374.4M
price $0.235 · 7d −14.9% · 30d −33.0%
FDV $571.5M (1.5× market cap)
source defillama
Counted per year
$12.8M
holders revenue of the last 30 days, $2.6M, × 365 ÷ 30, × type factor 0.404775 (payouts to vote lockers count 40%)
Pays out 8.4% of its market cap a year, using 94¢ of every $1 it earns.
Not a buyback: counts for 40% in the multiple (type factor 0.404775), so the denominator is $12.8M instead of $31.6M.
Multiple
29.3×peer median 19.5× (Dexs, 13 tokens), against 29.3× here
Run-rate
18.4×
last 7 days $964k × 52 × 0.4 (type factor) = $20.3M a year
last week's payout to holders ran 1.6× the 30-day pace: the payout is speeding up
What we checked
- Valuation
Multiple 29.3× (type factor 0.404775: payouts to vote lockers count 40%), 1.5× more expensive than its Dexs peers (median 19.5×, 13 tokens). The group's largest earner Uniswap trades at 37.3×: 1.3× cheaper per dollar returned to holders. On total revenue: 11.1×, 1.5× cheaper than the revenue peer median.
- Distribution
ve / bribes: Includes bribes and vote incentives from third parties paid to vote-escrow lockers; no buy pressure on the token. Holders got $2.6M of $2.8M revenue in 30 days → buyback share 94%. DefiLlama: “CurveDEX Bribes Revenue: All bribes revenue to holders”
- Sustainability
Holders were paid on 30 of 30 days (100%); largest single day 21% of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 86% of the best week in 90 days. Revenue +28% over 7 days and +44% over 30 days, price −33% over 30 days.
What this does not tell you
The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.
Flags
- Data issue: chain mapping missingData issue (chain mapping missing): warning, scores are computed as usual
How the buyback really works
Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.
- Holders revenue / revenue (30d)
- $2.6M / $2.8M
- last 30 closed days
- To holders
- Pays out 8.4% of its market cap a year
- FDV / dilution
- $571.5M / 1.5×
- FDV ÷ market cap
- Price 7d / 30d
- −14.9% / −33.0%
- Revenue growth 7d / 30d
- +28% / +44%
- versus the period before
- Divergence
- 0.77
- revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
- DEX liquidity
- $13.5M
- DexScreener, representative pools
- 24h volume
- $39.5M
- all markets, CoinGecko
- Unlocks 30d
- —
- DefiLlama's schedule does not cover the next 30 days while tokens are still locked
- Revenue multiple
- 11.1×
- market cap ÷ revenue per year
- Fee multiple
- 4.8×
- market cap ÷ fees per year
- Distance to peak
- 86%
- this week ÷ best week of 90 days
- Data since
- May 4
- first day with holders revenue
Holders revenue and price
Multiple over time
Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.
Signal history
| Date | Signal | Price then | After 7d | After 30d | Since | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 3, 2026 | Day jumpclosed Nov 4: REV $14k on 2026-11-03 below 1.5 × the old average $99.7k | $0.264 | −7% | — | −11% | 30-day check: day 9 |
| November 1, 2026 | New in top 20active | $0.283 | −9% | — | −17% | 30-day check: day 11 |
| November 1, 2026 | Revenue jumpclosed Nov 1: the condition no longer holds | $0.284 | −9% | — | −17% | 30-day check: day 11 |
Versus peers
Dexs · 13 tokens · median multiple 19.5× · Uniswap is valued 9.9× higher. Per dollar that counts for holders, Curve Finance is 1.3× cheaper.
Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).
| Token | Distribution | Multiple | Revenue multiple | Buyback share | To holders 30d | Market cap | Rev. growth 30d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pharaoh Exchange | ve / bribes | 0.3× | 0.2× | 100% | $1.3M | $2.6M | −52% |
| RamsesX | Mixed | 0.7× | 0.5× | 97% | $368k | $2.2M | +8% |
| nest | Distribution | 0.8× | 0.4× | 100% | $869k | $4.4M | +32% |
| up | ve / bribes | 2.0× | 1.0× | 100% | $313k | $3.9M | −68% |
| Chainflip | Buyback + burn | 5.4× | 5.4× | 100% | $520k | $34.4M | +59% |
| Aero | ve / bribes | 8.7× | 4.0× | 96% | $7.4M | $372.0M | −6% |
| PancakeSwap | Buyback + burn | 19.5× | 12.8× | 65% | $2.4M | $563.6M | −29% |
| Raydium | Buyback | 27.1× | 16.8× | 62% | $1.3M | $425.4M | −65% |
| Curve Financethis token | ve / bribes | 29.3× | 11.1× | 94% | $2.6M | $374.4M | +44% |
| Uniswapleader | Buyback + burn | 37.3× | 37.3× | 100% | $8.2M | $3.71B | −20% |
| Orca | Buyback | 47.8× | 7.9× | 16% | $130k | $75.6M | −36% |
| Aster | Buyback + burn | 50.2× | ∞ | — | $2.8M | $1.69B | — |
| Meteora | Distribution | 180× | 5.2× | 18% | $458k | $161.9M | −60% |
Score build-up63 of 100
Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.
Penaltiesnone
No penalty applies — 10 rules checked, 3 wait for research data
Where the numbers come from
- Revenue source
- 4 active children
- DefiLlama adapter per child
- Price and market cap
- defillama / defillama
- latest fetch
- Scored on
- November 11, 2026
- as-of date of the last compute run
- On-chain verified
- not yet
- not checked yet
Protocols behind this token4 at DefiLlama
Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.
- Curve DEXDexs · Ethereum, Polygon, OP Mainnet, Gnosis, Fantom, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Base, Celo, Mantle, BSC, Fraxtal, Sonic, Ink, Hyperliquid L1, Plasma, Unichain, Monad, Stable, Robinhood Chain, Etherlinktype ve-distribution · source label
“CurveDEX Bribes Revenue: All bribes revenue to holders”
90% of the protocol's share of pool fees, distributed to veCRV holders, plus all bribes.
- CurveDEX Bribes Revenue
- All bribes revenue to holders
- CurveDEX Fees To veCRV Holders
- Fees distributed to veCRV governance token holders
- crvUSDCDP · Ethereumtype ve-distribution · source label
“crvUSD Fees To veCRV Holders: Revenue share to veCRV holders.”
Revenue share to veCRV holders.
- crvUSD Fees To veCRV Holders
- Revenue share to veCRV holders.
- Curve LlamaLend V2Lending · OP Mainnet, Ethereumtype unclear · source text
“Not applicable — protocol fees route to Curve DAO fee receivers, not CRV token holders.”
Not applicable — protocol fees route to Curve DAO fee receivers, not CRV token holders.
adapter on GitHub ↗ - Curve LlamaLendLending · Ethereum, Arbitrum, OP Mainnet, Fraxtal, Sonictype unclear · source none
No methodology text at DefiLlama.
adapter on GitHub ↗