Sapling SAPLING

Sell signal activeRank#2▼1Score62

Sell signal held since Nov 4, before tracking started. no sell variant computable (previous periods below the floors). Still open: payout at 3% of its 90-day peak. See Signals.

Launchpad, Solana, Robinhood Chain, 48 days of data,

Active signals 3

Sell signalheld since Nov 4
Revenue this week $5k, 25% of the week before.
Weekly revenue drop: revenue this week $5k, 0.3× the week before, paid to holders 0.3× the week before. Still open: payout at 3% of its 90-day peak.
New in top 20held since Oct 30
Ranked #2 on Nov 11, down from #1 the day before.
New protocol with revenuesince Oct 31
New protocol, 36 days of data: $59k to holders this week, $232k in 30 days.

Market cap

$1.1M

price $0.00142 · 7d −51.2% · 30d −22.4%

FDV $1.1M (1.0× market cap)

source coingecko

Buyback revenue / year

$1.2M

holders revenue of the last 30 days, $100k, × 365 ÷ 30

Buyback + burnbuyback share 82%

Buys back 109% of its market cap a year, using 82¢ of every $1 it earns.

Multiple

0.9×

peer median 1.7× (Launchpad, 5 tokens), against 0.9× here

Run-rate

5.7×

last 7 days $4k × 52 = $195k a year

last week's payout to holders ran at 16% of the 30-day pace: the payout is slowing

What we checked

Valuation
Multiple 0.9×, 1.8× cheaper than its Launchpad peers (median 1.7×, 5 tokens). The group's largest earner Pump trades at 5.8×: 6.3× cheaper per dollar returned to holders. On total revenue: 0.7×, 7.2× cheaper than the revenue peer median.
Distribution
Buyback + burn: Revenue buys the token on the market and the bought tokens are burned. Holders got $100k of $122k revenue in 30 days → buyback share 82%. DefiLlama: “Token Buy Back: 25% of the 2% coin trading fee, used to buy $SAPLING and burn it (burned directly for coins paired with $SAPLING).”
Sustainability
Holders were paid on 30 of 30 days (100%); largest single day 44% of the month's holders revenue; paid to holders this week: 3% of the best week in 90 days (more than half below peak). Revenue −75% over 7 days and −30% over 30 days, price −22% over 30 days.

What this does not tell you

The figures come from DefiLlama's adapter for each child protocol. Only a few tokens have an on-chain check (see How the buyback really works); for the rest, whether the tokens were really bought, burned or parked in a treasury wallet is not checked here. Unlocks count where DefiLlama or our research has a vesting schedule; team discretion and liquidity depth only once researched.

Flags

Sell signalheld since Nov 4, before tracking started; no sell variant computable (previous periods below the floors). Still open: payout at 3% of its 90-day peak. See Signals
Payout >50% below peakthis week's holders revenue is 3% of its best week in the last 90 days ($123k)
Insufficient history47 days of data; g30, divergence not computable yet and scored as neutral 50

How the buyback really works

Not researched yet. Everything above comes from DefiLlama and market data only.

Holders revenue / revenue (30d): $100k / $122k; last 30 closed days
To holders: Buys back 109% of its market cap a year
FDV / dilution: $1.1M / 1.0×; FDV ÷ market cap
Price 7d / 30d: −51.2% / −22.4%
Revenue growth 7d / 30d: −75% / −30%; versus the period before
Divergence: —; revenue growth minus price growth, 30d
DEX liquidity: $259k; DexScreener, representative pools
24h volume: $153k; all markets, CoinGecko
Unlocks 30d: —; no unlock schedule for this token
Revenue multiple: 0.7×; market cap ÷ revenue per year
Fee multiple: 0.5×; market cap ÷ fees per year
Distance to peak: 3%; this week ÷ best week of 90 days
Data since: Sep 25; first day with holders revenue

Holders revenue and price

Holders revenue per day7-day averagePrice (right axis)▲ ▼ signal days (history below)

Multiple over time

today 0.9× (scored) · peer median 1.7×

Market cap at close ÷ (holders revenue of the previous 30 days × 365 ÷ 30), with holders revenue capped at revenue and × the type factor: the same effective multiple as the peer median. Values above 100× are drawn at the top. Bands as on the meter; dashed line = peer median today.

Signal history

Signal history of this token: date, type, price at the signal, price after 7 and 30 days, change since the signal and the outcome
Date	Signal	Price then	After 7d	After 30d	Since	Outcome
November 4, 2026	Sell signalactive	$0.00334	—	—	−57%	not counted
October 30, 2026	New in top 20active	$0.00315	−2%	—	−55%	not counted
October 31, 2026	Multiple below medianclosed Nov 8: the condition no longer holds	$0.00315	−2%	—	−55%	30-day check: day 11
October 31, 2026	New protocol with revenueactive	$0.00315	−2%	—	−55%	30-day check: day 11

Versus peers

Launchpad · 6 tokens (5 with a multiple) · median multiple 1.7× · Pump is valued 1384.9× higher. Per dollar that counts for holders, Sapling is 6.3× cheaper.

Main-ranking peers only. Multiples count holders revenue capped at revenue, × the type factor (buyback 1 · buyback + burn 1 · burn 0.75 · mixed 0.75 · distribution 0.5 · unclear 0.5 · ve-distribution 0.25).

This token against its main-ranking peers: multiple, revenue multiple, buyback share, holders revenue, market cap and revenue growth
Token	Distribution	Multiple	Revenue multiple	Buyback share	To holders 30d	Market cap	Rev. growth 30d
OTC	Buyback + burn	0.5×	0.2×	43%	$292k	$1.9M	+111%
Saplingthis token	Buyback + burn	0.9×	0.7×	82%	$100k	$1.1M	−30%
StonkFun	Buyback + burn	1.7×	1.0×	60%	$1.7M	$34.5M	−88%
Pons	Buyback + burn	5.7×	5.7×	118%	$1.7M	$99.8M	−84%
Pumpleader	Buyback	5.8×	2.6×	44%	$21.9M	$1.54B	−24%
BONK.fun	Mixed	∞	11.7×	95%	$1.5M	$233.7M	−67%

Score build-up62 of 100

Total score = 35% valuation + 25% momentum + 20% divergence + 20% quality − penalties, clamped to 0–100. Every number here can be recomputed from the figures on this page.

62of 100#2▼1top 2% one or more parts are the neutral 50

Valuation 35.0Momentum 12.5Divergence 10.0Quality 9.0penalties −5= 61.5

Valuation35%

100Valuation 100.0: HR half 100.0 (multiple 0.91×; 100 at ≤3×, 0 at ≥100×, log scale), revenue half 100.0 (revenue peer value 7.20×; 0 at ≤0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥3×, log scale).Average of two halves. HR half: linear in log(multiple), 100 at ≤ 3×, 0 at ≥ 100×, 0 without effective HR. Revenue half: linear in log(revenue peer value), 0 at ≤ 0.33×, 50 at 1×, 100 at ≥ 3×; neutral 50 when the peer group falls back to the universe.

Momentum25%capped

50Momentum 50.0 (neutral): g7 −1.387, g30 unknown; missing history gives the neutral 50.m = 0.5·g7 + 0.3·ln(day jump, clamped ±1.5) + 0.2·g30; 0 at m ≤ −0.7, 50 at 0, 100 at ≥ 1.1. Neutral 50 when g7 or g30 is missing; a missing day jump counts as 0.

Divergence20%capped

50Divergence 50.0 (neutral): d unknown (missing history).d = max(0, g30 − p30) when g30 > 0; 0 at d ≤ 0, 100 at d ≥ 1.5, linear.

Quality20%

45Quality 45.1: mean of days HR>0 100% → 100.0 (0 at ≤30%, 100 at ≥90%), largest day 44% of HR30 → 35.4 (0 at ≥60%, 100 at ≤15%), distance to peak 0.03 → 0.0 (0 at ≤0.25, 100 at ≥0.9).Average of: share of days with HR > 0 (0 at ≤ 30%, 100 at ≥ 90%), 1 − largest day ÷ HR30 (0 at ≥ 60%, 100 at ≤ 15%) and distance to peak (0 at ≤ 0.25, 100 at ≥ 0.9).

Penalty −5 (history_30_60): history 48 days (30-60).

HR7 is below 50% of its 90-day peak: momentum and divergence are capped at 50. This is not a penalty; the distance already counts in quality.

Penalties−5

−5History 30 to 60 dayshistory 48 days (30-60)

9 rules not applied, 3 wait for research data.

Where the numbers come from

Revenue source: 1 active child; DefiLlama adapter per child
Price and market cap: defillama / coingecko; latest fetch
Scored on: November 11, 2026; as-of date of the last compute run
On-chain verified: not yet; not checked yet

Protocols behind this token1 at DefiLlama

Per protocol: DefiLlama's methodology text, the distribution type we read from it and the sentence that decided it. The token takes the type of the protocol that returns the most to holders.

Sapling
Launchpad · Solana, Robinhood Chain
type buyback-burn · source label
“Token Buy Back: 25% of the 2% coin trading fee, used to buy $SAPLING and burn it (burned directly for coins paired with $SAPLING).”
50% of the 2% coin trading fee: 25% buys and burns $SAPLING, and 25% goes to the $SAPLING/ZEC pool on PumpSwap, where about half of it buys $SAPLING, both sides are deposited and the LP tokens are burned, so no one, Sapling included, can withdraw it. On Robinhood Chain the shares apply to what reaches Sapling's splitter: the 2% creator tax plus the creator's 70% of Pons's 1% fee. For LaunchLab coins, half of the curve platform fee and the graduated pool's fees: $SAPLING buyback and burn, and the protocol-owned $SAPLING/ZEC pool, whose position is locked for good.
Token Buy Back
25% of the 2% coin trading fee, used to buy $SAPLING and burn it (burned directly for coins paired with $SAPLING). On Robinhood Chain the share is of what reaches Sapling's splitter. For LaunchLab coins, a quarter of the curve platform fee and the graduated pool's fees.
$SAPLING/ZEC Liquidity
25% of the 2% coin trading fee, added to the $SAPLING/ZEC pool on PumpSwap: about half of it buys $SAPLING, both sides are deposited and the LP tokens are burned, so no one, Sapling included, can withdraw it (held in a vault per coin before 2026-10-02, then moved into the same liquidity). On Robinhood Chain the share is of what reaches Sapling's splitter. For LaunchLab coins, a quarter of the curve platform fee and the graduated pool's fees, added to a protocol-owned $SAPLING/ZEC pool whose position is locked for good.
adapter on GitHub ↗